CAPAs that actually hold.
Deviations explained with their history, root causes that go beyond operator error, and actions that are checked until they work.
- For
- Quality engineer
- Paperwork
- 2 days → 10 min
- You keep
- the decision
Paperwork2 daysDraftedby SmartHowYou approve10 minWhat stops landing on it.
- Pull the batch history
- Write the deviation
- Chase action owners
- Wait for the next audit to find the gaps
- The report that writes itself.
- The CAPA that follows itself up.
- The procedure that fixes itself.
- Asks you for one decision
Times are illustrative. We measure yours in the first month.
A day with the management system running itself.
Yesterday's deviations are drafted with their batch history.
A root cause beyond operator error, with three similar events cited.
CAPA owners reminded; two effectiveness checks passed.
Tomorrow's audit pack is ready, clause by clause.
defects with digital instructions instead of paper
Source · Letmathe & Rößler, Journal of Operations Management, 2022Open any of these to see it run.
What quality teams ask first.
How soon is it useful?
Most teams start with one plant and one workflow, and see drafts in the first weeks.
What does my team have to change?
Very little. People keep the tools they have; SmartHow reads, drafts and asks for approval.
Can it work with GMP records?
GMP use requires a validated system. Validation is planned with your quality unit.
Watch your management system run itself.
In 30 minutes we run SmartHow on a real case from your industry: an incident report writes itself, a procedure fixes itself, a lesson reaches every plant. You only approve.
- A real example from your industry, not a slideshow
- 30 minutes with an industrial engineer
- Leave knowing where it saves your plants the most hours